Panipat Download Full Watch Here youtube Full Movie megavideo

13 de febrero de 2020 - 21:55

↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓

stream-flick.com

⇧⇧⇧⇧⇧⇧⇧⇧⇧⇧⇧

Genre - History Ashutosh Gowariker year - 2019 cast - Sanjay Dutt Tomatometer - 6,3 / 10 stars. Panipat the great betrayal. Hamara history me sab apne fayde ke liye Jung ladi. Lekin ab Hume batna nahi chahiye.

Panipat the great betrayal movie.
Sir please do on bijapur Kingdom.
Who miss nana patekar like here.
Good job bro.

Panipat 3a the great betrayal reaction. Panipat 3a the great betrayal dj. In a months time well have Om Rauts Tanhaji, where Ajay Devgn will slip into long dresses to portray Shivajis military commander. Rating: Cast: Arjun Kapoor, Sanjay Dutt, Kriti Sanon, Mohnish Bahl, Padmini Kolhapure, Zeenat Aman, Kunal Kapoor, Nawab Shah, Suhasini Mulay Director: Ashutosh Gowariker It seems that unbeknownst to you and me, at some point in 2014 the luminaries of Bollywood were called to a secret meeting where a unanimous resolution was passed: As a crucial building block of New India, all of India needs lessons to internalise the greatness of India and Indians. Past and present glories, true or false, must be resurrected on screen, pronto. The resolution set out the terms and conditions of the way these stories were to be told. All annoying crimps — of personality and character, of mistakes, misdemeanours and maleficence — that did not smoothly fit into the mould of Hindu, Patriotic, Maryada Purushottam (HPMP) were to be twisted into submission of the great Hindu Rashtra. Several addendums were attached to the main resolution, and though it has been reported that Akshay Kumar decamped with a whole bunch of them, some did get left behind for the other eager beavers. One such addendum was on the great Marathas. By great Marathas they meant (obvo) the intrepid, male, macho, chest-thumping desh bhakt warriors who killed and died for Hindu Rashtra. The first lesson in the skewed history of Marathas came from Sanjay Leela Bhansali whose Bajirao galloped alongside an exquisite Mastani in the 2015 war-romance. And right now, on our screens, we have Ashutosh Gowarikers Panipat: The Great Betrayal, which tells the story of Sadashivrao Bhau who lead the Maratha army to battle Ahmed Shah Abdali. Or into whats better known as the Third Battle of Panipat. Panipats story is narrated by the voiceover of a lady. Shes not Bharat Mata, yet she could very well be. In Punes Shaniwar Wada, Nana Saheb Peshwa (Mohnish Bahl as the Maratha Prime Minister) presides. He has a wife, Gopikabai (Padmini Kohlapure) whose facial contortions tell us that she was not all sweet and soft on the hulking Sadashivrao Bhau (Arjun Kapoor) who he is being feted and fawned upon for winning several wars and qilas. Though there are some aghast faces in the durbar when Sadashivrao presents his prisoner, Ibrahim Khan Gardi (Nawab Shah) as the man who will head the Maratha armys cannon ball and fire brigade, upon his cajoling all agree. Sadashivrao has no designs on the gaddi. He doesnt even seem to have a healthy desire for the girl with the longest waist in Shaniwar Wada. Parvati (Kriti Sanon) flits around him carrying ubtans and jadi-booti to heal his wounds, but he is happy to focus on completing 1, 500 Surya Namaskars and sing songs of Mard Maratha while prancing about in low-waist frocks. But since Parvati insists so much and then goes home rooth-ke, Sadashivrao goes after her and they wed. Marathas were Pune people, but their power extended to Delhi whose Mughal king was their puppet. But one man in Delhi, Najib ad-Dawlah, wanted more and so he invited his pal in Afghanistan, Ahmed Shah Abdali (Sanjay Dutt) to come to India and defeat the Marathas. Abdali, a frequent visitor to India, obliged since he wasnt really having a jolly time in his Kadhahar palace where every time he sat on the peacock throne and put on the crown with the Kohinoor, someone would attack him. Word reached the Marathas who, it seems, didnt have the soldiers, the stamina or the funds to travel so far up north. Yet, after much bombast about desh and Maratha mard from Sadashivrao, he is given 40, 000 troops and sent off. Except that along tagged Parvati and about 1, 00, 000 pilgrims, all of whom he had to feed and protect. Then it begins, the game of trying to stitch together a maha gathbandhan in which Najib beat Sadashivrao, and the few allies that he did have were lost because of his big fat Maratha ego. Sadashivrao and his entourage march to Delhi, which they win, and then pause to sing a song while the jhanda, in true Ekta Kapoor style, rises up again and again… In Kunjpura, Marathas beat one contingent of the Afghans, but the Yamuna being in spate and all, stalls both the armies on either side, giving Abdali and Sadashivrao enough time to stare at each other through their one-eye binoculars. But then Abdali outsmarts the Marathas and what follows is a long-drawn battle which for the longest time felt like the slowest match at Wimbledon. One gola of barood flies from this side to devastate that side. Then the devastated side despatches one gola barood to devastate the other… And so it goes on till Sadashiv is forced off his haathi for a dramatic sword fight. Ashutosh Gowarikar has made eight films, of which three are memorable, including Lagaan, which set the gold standard of myth-making. But Gowariker is no Bhansali. This means, thankfully, that his bigotry is in check. He doesnt turn all Muslims into meat-chomping barbarians lusting after Bharatiya naris and zameen. But he also doesnt have Bhansalis artistry and skill to tell his story with seductive cinematic sorcery and dramatic highs. He has built elaborate sets and decks up all his yoddhas and ladies in exquisite clothes, accessorised by pearls and jewels that you cant help but ogle at. And yet he doesnt milk that beauty. His laborious screenplay is so devoid of drama and thrill that even dramatic scenes lack tension. The films dialogue (by poet Ashok Chakradhar) are rather banal. Characters flit in and out of the frame saying their dialogue, but none of them acquire a personality. Not even Sadashirao and Abdali. Arjun Kapoor gets a lot of screen time, but is just adequate. Kriti Sanon is pretty and pretty decent. But their chemistry and biology is non-existent. Sanjay Dutt is terrible and pointless. He should have been sent off to get a shave and have a bath instead. Panipat: The Great Betrayal is a proudly Marathi enterprise. Based on a book by T. S. Shejwalkar, it is directed by Gowariker and part produced by Rohit Shelatkar, a “London-based pharma magnet”. That it released on December 6, the day Babri Masjid was reduced to rubble 27 years ago, is not entirely coincidental. In New India, its a date that is being written in a happy font. If you have studied Indian history, you will balk at the story that Gowariker tries to sell here, especially when you realise that the great betrayal the film insinuates is actually by the writer-director himself. Gowariker and his three screenplay writers have kept the names of the key players intact, but have taken leave of facts to create fictitious fiction about an epic, bloody battle and its main protagonists. Panipat does show us how desperate Abdali was at one point not to fight, even trying to negotiate with Sadashivrao, and the proud Maratha not agreeing to his terms, but it omits the real reasons why Marathas lost the battle and changed the course of Indias history. Sadashivrao did not have allies because he either rejected them (Jats) or ignored them (Sikhs and Rajputs. The only betrayal was by Shuja-Ud-Daula, the Nawab of Awadh, who was convinced by Najib and Abdali to join the “army of Islam”. The film also tries to obscure the real reason the Marathas finally declared war on Abdali on January 13, 1761 — it was because the Maratha chiefs begged Sadashivrao to be allowed to die in battle rather than perish by starvation. Gowarikers Panipat claims that Abdali wrote a letter of commendation, hailing the brave Sadashivrao. Not true. But worse is Gowarikers pronouncement at the end, that after the 3rd Battle of Panipat, Abdali never returned to India. Hain. This was Abdalis 5th attack on India. Two more invasions, involving at least five more battles, ensued, including the Sikh Massacre of 1762. Directors like Gowariker do no service to the nation or their audience by twisting the truth, ignoring military, diplomatic, common sense follies and rewriting history with jingoistic fervour. They condemn us to repeat historical wrongs.

Panipat: the great betrayal song. 0 0 Posted by 2 months ago 3 comments 21% Upvoted Log in or sign up to leave a comment log in sign up Sort by View discussions in 3 other communities level 1 3 points 2 months ago How the hell this came in my subscribed list level 1 1 point 2 months ago An over the top shitty trailer, dude Bollywood has better movies to offer not this utter shit! level 1 1 point 1 month ago My take on the movie More posts from the movies community Continue browsing in r/movies r/movies News & Discussion about Major Motion Pictures 22. 2m Members 13. 8k Online Created Jan 25, 2008 help Reddit App Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts Communities Top Posts Topics about careers press advertise blog Terms Content policy Privacy policy Mod policy Reddit Inc 2020. All rights reserved.

Jai mratha,jai shivaji jai bharat nice tireler my favourite actor. Name: Panipat (U/A) Language: Hindi Running Time: 2 hr 53 mins Rating: 7. 3 / 10 from 60 users Panipat International Release Dates Panipat Film Songs Panipat Songs are not available at this moment. You can add it using the "Add Missing Songs" button above Panipat Movie Audience Reviews Panipat, The Great Betrayal is really made with effort which. Panipat, The Great Betrayal is really made with effort which comes into one's movie is just the true ride of history with intriguing characters especially Parvatibai. Sadashivrao, the general of The Maratha army and Ruler Ahmad Shah Abdaali face each other over the battlefield of Panipat with just the waters of Yamuna separating them. Panipat was one of the greatest wars of India. Marathas led by Sadashivrao had to cross many hurdles to reach Panipat and shortage of food makes even mor... Posted by Varada Amonkar on 06-12-2019 at google *Panipat* Bollywood movie by Ashutosh Gowarikar Datta, Arjun kapoor, Kriti Senan Star. 2. 8. Third. Panipat* Third Panipat Battle 14th January 1761 First half was focussed on love story of Sadashivrao rather than battle. Movie is of 173 minutes too long and very slowly narrated. Last half an hour was good to watch and revealed why were Marathas lost the battle but they all fought bravely with Abdalli military with hungry stomach. Abdalli itself praised the Marathas and Sadashivrao for t... Posted by Satish Tiwari As usual, Ashutosh is self proclaimed historian and always comes. As usual, Ashutosh is self proclaimed historian and always comes with controversial, sorry wrong history. People always used to say, cinema is mirror of society. Hahahaha Where are big stars like Amitabh, Shahrukh, Amir, always say words with keeping people emotion in front not their ZAMIR. This movie is minting money by saying "Based on true story. All fake Abdali was only 38 years not old like Sanju, He had only 30K sainik and he had never wear turban like Sanju did in movi... Posted by Arunish Ranjan Tel me one thing, India was lucrative location of all. Tel me one thing, India was lucrative location of all invaders and most of them were winner. Then why they came win and went back never return and died in short time…. It means they were not winner they lost battle and run away due to injuries they died in their mother land… in India no body can give then asylum… only winner like Babur/ Khilji remain in India... Winner always hand over their captured empire to their followers which they did not done... Historical fact was contaminated by Bri... Posted by Ranjit Singh Film is good... I'm a historian and upsc faculty. I. Film is good... I recommend this movie for students. little mistakes there but it's not big matter. Every upsc and PSC Aspirants must watch... it is about 1761 third battle of Panipat... it's describes how Maratha empire declined... nice movie... without basic knowledge on history you cannot enjoy the movie Posted by Mahesh Prathapani Panipat Videos Trailers Other Popular Ashutosh Gowariker Movies Panipat Panipat is a 2019 Hindi Film stars Ashutosh Gowariker, Sanjay Dutt, Arjun Kapoor, Ajay Gogavale, Atul Gogavale, Kriti Sanon, Kabir Bedi, Padmini Kolhapure, Kunal Kapoor, Mohnish Bahl, Nawab Shah, Ravindra Mahajani, Suhasini Mulay, directed by Ashutosh Gowariker & music by Atul Gogavale. Panipat Release Date is 06-12-2019 and Panipat running time is 173 Min.

Panipat the great betrayal imdb. Excellent Video. Very Informative... there is NO doubt that the brutal & fanatic Islamic Mughal rule in India faced stiff resistance at different periods from the great RAJPUT warriors, fierce AHOM warriors from Assam & from Punjab the brave SIKH 's strength lies in Unity in Diversity. Rightly did the great Hindi Poet Bhushana, who forsook the royal favours of the Mughal court to come over to Shivaji to record his glories, he sang : “काशी की कला जाती, मथुरा की मसजीद बनती, अगर शिवाजी ना होते तो सबकी सुन्नत होती.” meaning. Had not there been Shivaji, Kashi would have lost its culture,Mathura would have been turned into a mosque and all would have been circumcised.) If not for Shivaji and the Marathas, there would have existed a continuous Islamic belt from Morocco to Indonesia. What addition of 1 billion more adherents to Islam would have done to the world power balance or what would have happened to Indian legacy like yoga, ayurveda, music, art and philosophy, is not difficult to guess…. It is worthwhile examining the 'what if' of Indias history, Aurengzeb, Akbars great great grandson, had embarked on the 'Islamisation' of India. The Marathas, inspired by Shivaji, fought Aurengzeb and saved India from following the fate of Persia. The proof of Maratha victory lies in the fact that Aurengzeb lies buried, not in Lahore /Delhi or Agra, but near Aurangabad in good old Maharashtra. Indian history before Shivaji's advent reads like a chronicle of military disasters. Shivaji changed all that. He used Guerilla Tactics very effectively. Shivaji, as a great warrior & visionary laid a strong and solid foundation that after his death in 1680, there was a series of battles fought between Marathas and Mughals from 1681 to 1707 known as 'War of 27 years' and ended with the death of Aurangzeb in 1707. The Marathas eventually emerged victorious and consolidated their lost territories. This was further expanded by the Peshwas. The Maratha empire reached its peak in summer of 1758 with the conquest of Attock, which is banks of Indus river in Pakistan today. Its eastern frontier was todays Orissa, being ruled by Raghuji Bhosale of Nagpur. Maratha armies had also reached upto Murshidabad, but then retreated and settled for tribute from Bengal and control of Orissa. To the south, in 1758, territories upto the fort of Gurramkonda in Kadappah district were held. Also, Tanjore (Thanjavur) was under Marathas, but that was a different line. In 1761, the PANIPAT war was lost to the Afghans but Marathas RECOVERED quickly like phoenix bird within 10 years and brought the whole of North Indian again under their control during the 1770's under leadership of Madhavrao rathas also defeated the Nizam of Hyderabad and Hyder Ali- Tipu Sultan of Mysore. Eventually, the Marathas grew stronger and fought the British in three Anglo–Maratha Wars (1775–82, 1803–05, 1817–18) In the First Anglo-Maratha War (1775–1782) the Marathas emerged Victorious. A Vijay Stambh (Victory Pillar) erected to commemorate Maratha victory over British is located at Vadgaon/Wadgaon Maval, close to the city of Pune. The 2nd and 3rd were subsequently lost and British established themselves which was followed by the Uprising of 1857. By the way, just for your G.K, Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is also considered as the 'Father of the Indian Navy' AND Apart from Jijabai, 2 well known Women personalities emerging from the Maratha empire were Devi AHILYABAI HOLKAR and RANI LAXMIBAI of Jhansi also known as Manikarnika. Hearty Salute to the sacrifice made by our Great Sikhs, Rajputs, Marathas and Ahom warriors for standing up to brutality and defending Mother India ! Jai HIND. VANDE MATARAAM. VANDE MATARAAM. VANDE MATARAAM. VANDE MATARAAM. VANDE MATARAAM.

कोन कहता है. Bollywood News Kriti Sanon is currently gearing up for the release of her upcoming period-drama, Panipat. Recently, the actor shared a still from the much-anticipated film Written By Tarun Nair, Mumbai, Updated On: December 05, 2019 15:08 IST Kriti Sanon, who marked her debut in Bollywood with Heropanti, has completed four years in Bollywood and enjoys a massive fan following. Kriti is currently gearing up for the release of her upcoming period-drama, Panipat along with Sanjay Dutt and Arjun Kapoor. The film has garnered a humongous amount of attention from fans. Recently, Kriti took shared a still from the much-anticipated historical drama. Also Read, Kriti Sanon Flaunts A Huge, Red Bindi; Fans Point At Her Resemblance To Usha Uthup Kriti Sanon shares a still from Panipat The picture shared by Kriti sees the actor standing with a thali in front of Arjun Kapoor. Both the actors are seen donning traditional Maharashtrian outfits. Kriti Sanon captioned the image as "Tum Dhyaan Mein The, Tum Praan Mein The, Jaise Janam Janam, Jab Teer Tum Pe, Barse Toh Jaise, Ghayal Hue The Hum. Watch her love strengthen her husband's will to fight the epic battle of #Panipat. In theatres tomorrow. In Panipat, Kriti Sanon will be seen as Parvati Bai, wife of Sadashivrao Bhau. Take a look at the still shared by Kriti: Also Read, Arjun Kapoor And Rakul Preet Singh To Begin Shooting For Their Untitled Next; Read Details Also Read, Kriti Sanon, Arjun Kapoor Twin While Promoting Upcoming Film Panipat All about Panipat Panipat is a story of the lust for power resulting in a brutal battle between the Marathas and the Afghan invaders. The plot of the movie is traced back to the 1760s when the Third battle of Panipat was fought. The movie puts forth the story of one of the largest battles fought in the 18th century. Helmed by Ashutosh Gowariker, Panipat also stars actors like Padmini Kolhapure and Mohnish Bahl in prominent roles. The makers of Panipat have left no stone unturned for its success, as they have roped in Hindi cinema veteran, Zeenat Aman too, for a cameo sequence. Also Read, Kriti Sanon's Take On 'Panipat' Clashing With 'Pati Patni Aur Woh' At The Box Office Get the latest entertainment news from India & around the world. Now follow your favourite television celebs and telly updates. Republic World is your one-stop destination for trending Bollywood news. Tune in today to stay updated with all the latest news and headlines from the world of entertainment. Published: December 05, 2019 15:08 IST.

Panipat the great betrayal collection. A d b y D u c k D u c k G o Murad Baig, former Former corporate career then author on history. Answered 12w ago Author has 261 answers and 96. 2k answer views The Third Battle of Panipat in January 1761 was probably the longest and bloodiest battle in Indian history. A new Maratha army with modern French canons, superior horses and training to fight the European way with artillery and drilled infantry pursued some 70, 000 battle hardened Afghan cavalry for over ten weeks all over the northern plains. The ravaging armies stripped the land of all food, fodder, fuel and valuables with the result that the final battle was really determined by the weakness from starvation suffered both by the opposing soldiers and their horses. The casualties during the. Loading….

Panipat - The Great Betrayal (2019) Hindi Proper WEB-DL - 1080p - AVC. DD+5. 1 - 640Kbps. 4. 2GB: Panipat - The Great Betrayal (2019) Hindi Proper WEB-DL - 1080p - AVC - AAC - 2. 5GB: Panipat - The Great Betrayal (2019) Hindi Proper HDRip - 720p - x264 - DD5. 1 - 1. 3GB - Soft ESub: Panipat - The Great Betrayal (2019) Hindi Proper HDRip - 720p - x264 - AAC - 900MB - Soft ESub: Panipat (2019) Hindi Proper HDRip - 700MB - x264 - 1CD - MP3 - ESub: Panipat - The Great Betrayal (2019) Hindi Proper HDRip - 400MB - x264 - MP3 - Soft ESub: Panipat - The Great Betrayal (2019) Hindi Proper HDRip - 200MB - x264 - MP3 - Soft ESub: Panipat - The Great Betrayal (2019) Hindi Proper HDRip - XviD - 700MB - MP3 - Soft ESub.

Panipat: the great betrayal tv show. Ahmad shah abdali😍😍😍. Panipat: the great betrayal book. The latest one is Ashutosh Gowariker's Panipat: The Great Betrayal. Panipat movie review: Ashutosh Gowariker tweaks history into a Maratha fan fantasy sans Bhansali's insidious intent So at least Gowariker didn't get carried away and glorify Sati + depict Afghans as barbarians, but still what is the fucking point of this movie? Sure, movies will have historical inaccuracies, and it's the case even with Hollywood movies. But why do Bollywood movies lack even an iota of truth? So according to the movie: i) A Jat king from Braj speaks Haryanvi. The movie shows that he wanted some petty fort. Interestingly, he already had that fort under control and he dropped out because he was against Sadashivraos war strategy. Later after Maratha defeat, he guaranteed safe passage to Maratha women and fed all the wounded people. ii) Rajputs went to fight the war and let Afghans kill Sadashivrao at the end. That's the "great betrayal. In reality, Rajputs didn't participate in the war. iii) Sadashivrao was an astute diplomat and commander. In reality, his poor diplomacy and stupid war planning led to the demise. iv) Portrayed as a very primitive medieval battle. On the other hand, this one actually had guns and cannons.

Jai ho maratha jai ho sadashiv, Ibrahim Khan gardi shemsher bahadur and vishvas rao. Amazing movie. YouTube. Third Battle of Panipat The Third Battle of Panipat, 14 January 1761, Hafiz Rahmat Khan, standing right of Ahmad Shah Abdali, who is shown sitting on a brown horse. Date 14 January 1761 Location Panipat (in present-day Haryana, India) 2923′N 7658′E. 29. 39N 76. 97E Result Durrani victory [1] Territorial changes Marathas lost suzerainty over Panipat and areas south of Panipat including Delhi to the Durranis. Ahmad Shah Durrani vacates Delhi soon after the battle. Belligerents Durrani Empire Supported by: Rohillas Maratha Empire Commanders and leaders Ahmad Shah Durrani Persian Officers Timur Shah Durrani Wazir Wali Khan [1] Shah Pasand Khan [1] Barkhurdar Khan [2] Wazirullah Khan [2] Rohilla Officers Shuja-ud-Daula [3] Najib-ud-Daula [4] Amir Beg [2] Jahan Khan [1] Zain Khan Sirhindi Murad Khan [2] Shuja Quli Khan Hafiz Rahmat Khan [1] Dundi Khan [1] Banghas Khan [1] Nasir Khan Baluch [2] Ahmad Khan Bangash [2] Sadashiv Rao Bhau (commander-in-chief of Maratha Army) Vishwasrao Bhatt Malharrao Holkar Mahadji Shinde ( WIA) Ibrahim Khan Gardi Jankoji Shinde ( POW) Shamsher Bahadur ( DOW) Damaji Gaikwad Yashwant Rao Pawar Shri. Arvandekar Sidoji Gharge Strength 41, 800 Afghan cavalry of which 28, 000 was regular cavalry [5] 32000 Rohilla infantry [5] 55, 000 Maratha cavalry of which 11, 000 was regular cavalry [5] 9, 000 gardi infantry [5] The force was accompanied by 200, 000 non-combatants (pilgrims and camp-followers. 6] Casualties and losses 15, 000 Rohillas killed 5, 000 Afghans killed. [5] 30, 000 killed in battle [5] 10, 000 killed while retreating. [5] 10, 000 reported missing. [5] 11, 000 fear stricken troops took refuge at Gwalior fort [5] Another 40, 000–70, 000 non-combatants executed following the battle. [7] 8] The Third Battle of Panipat took place on 14 January 1761 at Panipat, about 97 km (60 miles) north of Delhi, between the Maratha Empire and the invading Afghan army of the King of Afghans, Ahmad Shah Abdali, supported by three Indian allies — the Rohilla Najib-ud-daulah, Afghans of the Doab region, and Shuja-ud-Daula, the Nawab of Awadh. The Maratha army was led by Sadashivrao Bhau who was third in authority after the Chhatrapati (Maratha King) and the Peshwa (Maratha Prime Minister. The main Maratha army was stationed in Deccan with the Peshwa. Militarily, the battle pitted the artillery and cavalry of the Marathas against the heavy cavalry and mounted artillery ( zamburak and jezail) of the Afghans and Rohillas led by Abdali and Najib-ud-Daulah, both ethnic Afghans. The battle is considered one of the largest and most eventful fought in the 18th century, 9] and it has perhaps the largest number of fatalities in a single day reported in a classic formation battle between two armies. The specific site of the battle itself is disputed by historians, but most consider it to have occurred somewhere near modern-day Kaalaa Aamb and Sanauli Road. The battle lasted for several days and involved over 125, 000 troops. Protracted skirmishes occurred, with losses and gains on both sides. The forces led by Ahmad Shah Durrani came out victorious after destroying several Maratha flanks. The extent of the losses on both sides is heavily disputed by historians, but it is believed that between 60, 000–70, 000 were killed in fighting, while the numbers of injured and prisoners taken vary considerably. According to the single best eyewitness chronicle—the bakhar by Shuja-ud-Daulah's Diwan Kashi Raj—about 40, 000 Maratha prisoners were slaughtered in cold blood the day after the battle. [8] Grant Duff includes an interview of a survivor of these massacres in his History of the Marathas and generally corroborates this number. Shejwalkar, whose monograph Panipat 1761 is often regarded as the single best secondary source on the battle, says that "not less than 100, 000 Marathas (soldiers and non-combatants) perished during and after the battle. 7] The result of the battle was the temporary halting of further Maratha advances in the north and destabilisation of their territories for roughly ten years. This period is marked by the rule of Peshwa Madhavrao, who is credited with the revival of Maratha domination following the defeat at Panipat. In 1771, ten years after Panipat, he sent a large Maratha army into northern India in an expedition which re-established Maratha domination in that area and punished refractory powers that had either sided with the Afghans, such as the Rohillas, or had shaken off Maratha domination after Panipat. [10] But their success was short lived. Crippled by Madhavrao's untimely death at the age of 28, infighting ensued among Maratha chiefs soon after, and they ultimately met their final blow at the hands of the British in 1818. [11] Background Decline of the Mughal Empire The 27-year Mughal-Maratha war (1680–1707) led to rapid territorial loss of the Maratha Empire to the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb. However after his death in 1707, this process reversed following the Mughal Succession War between the sons of Aurangzeb. By 1712, Marathas quickly started retaking their lost lands. Under Peshwa Baji Rao, Gujarat, Malwa and Rajputana came under Maratha control. Finally, in 1737, Baji Rao defeated the Mughals on the outskirts of Delhi and brought much of the former Mughal territories south of Agra under Maratha control. Baji Rao's son Balaji Baji Rao further increased the territory under Maratha control by invading Punjab in 1758. Raghunathrao's letter to the Peshwa, 4 May 1758. “ Lahore, Multan and other subahs on eastern side of Attock are under our rule for the most part, and places which have not come under our rule we shall soon bring under us. Ahmad Shah Durrani's son Timur Shah Durrani and Jahan Khan have been pursued by our troops, and their troops completely looted. Both of them have now reached Peshawar with a few broken troops. So Ahmad Shah Durrani has returned to Kandahar with some 12-14 thousand broken troops... Thus all have risen against Ahmad who has lost control over the region. We have decided to extend our rule up to Kandahar. ” This brought the Marathas into direct confrontation with the Durrani empire of Ahmad Shah Abdali (also known as Ahmad Shah Durrani. In 1759 he raised an army from the Pashtun and Baloch tribes and made several gains against the smaller Maratha garrisons in Punjab. He then joined with his Indian allies—the Rohilla Afghans of the Gangetic Doab—forming a broad coalition against the Marathas. To counter this, Raghunathrao supposed to go north to handle the situation. Raghunathrao asked for large amount and an army, which was denied by Sadashivrao Bhau, his cousin and Diwan of Peshwa, so he declined to go. Sadashivrao Bhau was there upon made commander in chief of the Maratha Army, under whom the Battle of Panipat was fought. [12] The Marathas, under the command of Sadashivrao Bhau, responded by gathering an army of between 45, 000–60, 000, which was accompanied by roughly 200, 000 non-combatants, a number of whom were pilgrims desirous of making pilgrimages to Hindu holy sites in northern India. The Marathas started their northward journey from Patdur on 14 March 1760. Both sides tried to get the Nawab of Awadh, Shuja-ud-Daulah, into their camp. By late July Shuja-ud-Daulah made the decision to join the Afghan-Rohilla coalition, preferring to join what was perceived as the "army of Islam. This was strategically a major loss for the Marathas, since Shuja provided much-needed finances for the long Afghan stay in North India. It is doubtful whether the Afghan-Rohilla coalition would have the means to continue their conflict with the Marathas without Shuja's support. citation needed] Rise of the Marathas Grant Duff, describing the Maratha army: 13] The lofty and spacious tents, lined with silks and broadcloths, were surmounted by large gilded ornaments, conspicuous at a distance. Vast numbers of elephants, flags of all descriptions, the finest horses, magnificently caparisoned. seemed to be collected from every quarter. it was an imitation of the more becoming and tasteful array of the Mughuls in the zenith of their glory. The Marathas had gained control of a considerable part of India in the intervening period (1712–1757. In 1758 they nominally occupied Delhi, captured Lahore and drove out Timur Shah Durrani, 1] the son and viceroy of the Afghan ruler, Ahmad Shah Abdali. This was the high-water mark of Maratha expansion, where the boundaries of their empire extended north of the Sindhu river all the way down south to northern Kerala. This territory was ruled through the Peshwa, who talked of placing his son Vishwasrao on the Mughal throne. However, Delhi still remained under the control of Mughals, key Muslim intellectuals including Shah Waliullah and other Muslim clergies in India were frightened at these developments. In desperation they appealed to Ahmad Shah Abdali, the ruler of Afghanistan, to halt the threat. [14] Prelude Ahmad Shah Durrani ( Ahmad Shah Abdali) angered by the news from his son and his allies, was unwilling to allow the Marathas' spread go unchecked. By the end of 1759 Abdali with his Afghan tribes, his Baloch allies, and his Rohilla ally Najib Khan had reached Lahore as well as Delhi and defeated the smaller enemy garrisons. Ahmed Shah, at this point, withdrew his army to Anupshahr, on the frontier of the Rohilla country, where he successfully convinced the Nawab of Oudh Shuja-ud-Daula to join his alliance against the Marathas. The Marathas had earlier helped Safdarjung (father of Shuja) in defeating Rohillas in Farrukhabad. [10] The Marathas under Sadashivrao Bhau responded to the news of the Afghans' return to North India by raising an army, and they marched North. Bhau's force was bolstered by some Maratha forces under Holkar, Scindia, Gaikwad and Govind Pant Bundele. Suraj Mal (the Jat ruler of Bharatpur) also had joined Bhausaheb initially. This combined army captured the Mughal capital, Delhi, from an Afghan garrison in December 1759. [15] Delhi had been reduced to ashes many times due to previous invasions, and in addition there being acute shortage of supplies in the Maratha camp. Bhau ordered the sacking of the already depopulated city. [16] He is said to have planned to place his nephew and the Peshwa's son, Vishwasrao, on the Delhi throne. The Jats withdrew their support from the Marathas. Their withdrawal from the ensuing battle was to play a crucial role in its result. Abdali drew first blood by attacking a small Maratha army led by Dattaji Shinde at Burari Ghat. Dattaji was killed in the battle. [10] Afghan royal soldiers of the Durrani Empire (also referred to as the Afghan Empire. Afghan defeat at Kunjpura With both sides poised for battle, there followed much maneuvering, with skirmishes between the two armies fought at Karnal and Kunjpura. Kunjpura, on the banks of the Yamuna river 60 miles to the north of Delhi, was stormed by the Marathas and the whole Afghan garrison was killed or enslaved. [17] The Marathas achieved a rather easy victory at Kunjpura against an army of 15, 000 Afghans posted there. Some of Abdali's best generals were killed. Ahmad Shah was encamped on the left bank of the Yamuna River, which was swollen by rains, and was powerless to aid the garrison. The massacre of the Kunjpura garrison, within sight of the Durrani camp, exasperated Abdali to such an extent that he ordered crossing of the river at all costs. [18] Afghans cross Yamuna Ahmed Shah and his allies on 17 October 1760, broke up from Shahdara, marching south. Taking a calculated risk, Abdali plunged into the river, followed by his bodyguards and troops. Between 23 and 25 October they were able to cross at Baghpat (a small town about 24 miles up the river) unopposed by the Marathas who were still preoccupied with the sacking of Kunjpura. [19] After the Marathas failed to prevent Abdali's forces from crossing the Yamuna River, they set up defensive works in the ground near Panipat, thereby blocking his access back to Afghanistan, just as Abdali's forces blocked theirs to the south. However, on the afternoon of 26 October, Ahmad Shah's advance guard reached Sambalka, about halfway between Sonepat and Panipat, where they encountered the vanguard of the Marathas. A fierce skirmish ensued, in which the Afghans lost 1000 men but drove the Marathas back to their main body, which kept retreating slowly for several days. This led to the partial encirclement of the Maratha army. In skirmishes that followed, Govind Pant Bundele, with 10, 000 light cavalry who weren't formally trained soldiers, was on a foraging mission with about 500 men. They were surprised by an Afghan force near Meerut, and in the ensuing fight, Bundele was killed. This was followed by the loss of a contingent of 2, 000 Maratha soldiers who had left Delhi to deliver money and rations to Panipat. This completed the encirclement, as Ahmad Shah had cut off the Maratha army's supply lines. [20] With supplies and stores dwindling, tensions started rising in the Maratha camp. Initially the Marathas had moved in almost 150 pieces of modern long-range, French-made artillery. With a range of several kilometres, these guns were some of the best of the time. The Marathas' plan was to lure the Afghan army to confront them while they had close artillery support. [21] Preliminary moves During the next two months of the siege, constant skirmishes and duels took place between units from the two sides. In one of these Najib lost 3, 000 of his Rohillas and nearly killed himself. Facing a potential stalemate, Abdali decided to seek terms, which Bhau was willing to consider. However, Najib Khan delayed any chance of an agreement with an appeal on religious grounds and sowed doubt about whether the Marathas would honour any agreement. [22] After the Marathas moved from Kunjpura to Panipat, Diler Khan Marwat, with his father Alam Khan Marwat and a force of 2500 Pashtuns, attacked and took control of Kunjpura, where there was a Maratha garrison of 700–800 soldiers. At that time Atai Khan Baluch, son of the Wazir of Abdali, came from Afghanistan with 10, 000 cavalry and cut off the supplies to the Marathas. [10] The Marathas at Panipat were surrounded by Abdali in the south, Pashtun Tribes (Yousuf Zai, Afridi, Khattak) in the east, Shuja, Atai Khan and others in the north and other Pashtun tribes (Gandapur, Marwat, Durranis and Kakars) in the west. [10] Unable to continue without supplies or wait for reinforcements any longer, Bhau decided to break the siege. His plan was to pulverise the enemy formations with cannon fire and not to employ his cavalry until the Afghans were thoroughly softened up. With the Afghans broken, he would move camp in a defensive formation towards Delhi, where they were assured supplies. [10] Formations With the Maratha chiefs pressurizing Sadashivrao Bhau, to go to battle rather than perish by starvation, on 13 January, the Marathas left their camp before dawn and marched south towards the Afghan camp in a desperate attempt to break the siege. The two armies came face-to-face around 8:00 a. m. [10] The Maratha lines began a little to the north of Kala Amb. They had thus blocked the northward path of Abdali's troops and at the same time were blocked from heading south—in the direction of Delhi, where they could get badly needed supplies—by those same troops. Bhau, with the Peshwa's son and the royal guard (Huzurat) was in the centre. The left wing consisted of the Gardis under Ibrahim Khan. Holkar and Sindhia were on the extreme right. [23] The Maratha line was formed up some 12 km across, with the artillery in front, protected by infantry, pikemen, musketeers and bowmen. The cavalry was instructed to wait behind the artillery and bayonet-wielding musketeers, ready to be thrown in when control of the battlefield had been fully established. Behind this line was another ring of 30, 000 young Maratha soldiers who were not battle-tested, and then the civilians. Many were ordinary men, women and children on their pilgrimage to Hindu holy places and shrines. Behind the civilians was yet another protective infantry line, of young, inexperienced soldiers. [10] On the other side the Afghans formed a somewhat similar line, a few metres to the south of today's Sanauli Road. Their left was being formed by Najib and their right by two brigades of troops. Their left centre was led by two Viziers, Shuja-ud-daulah with 3, 000 soldiers and 50–60 cannons and Ahmad Shah's Vizier Shah Wali with a choice body of 19, 000 mailed Afghan horsemen. [24] The right centre consisted of 15, 000 Rohillas under Hafiz Rahmat and other chiefs of the Rohilla Pathans. Pasand Khan covered the left wing with 5, 000 cavalry, Barkurdar Khan and Amir Beg covered the right with 3, 000 Rohilla cavalry. Long-range musketeers were also present during the battle. In this order the army of Ahmed Shah moved forward, leaving him at his preferred post in the centre, which was now in the rear of the line, from where he could watch and direct the battle. [10] Battle Early phases Before dawn on 14 January 1761, the Maratha troops broke their fast with the last remaining grain in the camp and prepared for combat. They emerged from the trenches, pushing the artillery into position on their prearranged lines, some 2 km from the Afghans. Seeing that the battle was on, Ahmad Shah positioned his 60 smooth-bore cannon and opened fire. [10] The initial attack was led by the Maratha left flank under Ibrahim Khan, who advanced his infantry in formation against the Rohillas and Shah Pasand Khan. The first salvos from the Maratha artillery went over the Afghans' heads and did very little damage. Nevertheless, the first Afghan attack by Najib Khan's Rohillas broken by Maratha bowmen and pikemen, along with a unit of the famed Gardi musketeers stationed close to the artillery positions. The second and subsequent salvos were fired at point-blank range into the Afghan ranks. The resulting carnage sent the Rohillas reeling back to their lines, leaving the battlefield in the hands of Ibrahim for the next three hours, during which the 8, 000 Gardi musketeers killed about 12, 000 Rohillas. [10] In the second phase, Bhau himself led the charge against the left-of-center Afghan forces, under the Afghan Vizier Shah Wali Khan. The sheer force of the attack nearly broke the Afghan lines, and the Afghan soldiers started to desert their positions in the confusion. Desperately trying to rally his forces, Shah Wali appealed to Shuja ud Daulah for assistance. However, the Nawab did not break from his position, effectively splitting the Afghan force's center. Despite Bhau's success, the over-enthusiasm of the charge, the attack didn't achieve complete success as many of the half-starved Maratha mounts were exhausted. [10] Final phase The Marathas, under Scindia, attacked Najib. Najib successfully fought a defensive action, however, keeping Scindia's forces at bay. By noon it looked as though Bhau would clinch victory for the Marathas once again. The Afghan left flank still held its own, but the centre was cut in two and the right was almost destroyed. Ahmad Shah had watched the fortunes of the battle from his tent, guarded by the still unbroken forces on his left. He sent his bodyguards to call up his 15, 000 reserve troops from his camp and arranged them as a column in front of his cavalry of musketeers ( Qizilbash) and 2, 000 swivel-mounted shutarnaals or Ushtranaal—cannons—on the backs of camels. [25. page needed] The shaturnals, because of their positioning on camels, could fire an extensive salvo over the heads of their own infantry, at the Maratha cavalry. The Maratha cavalry was unable to withstand the muskets and camel-mounted swivel cannons of the Afghans. They could be fired without the rider having to dismount and were especially effective against fast-moving cavalry. Abdali therefore, sent 500 of his own bodyguards with orders to raise all able-bodied men out of camp and send them to the front. He sent 1, 500 more to punish the front-line troops who attempted to flee the battle and kill without mercy any soldier who would not return to the fight. These extra troops, along with 4, 000 of his reserve troops, went to support the broken ranks of the Rohillas on the right. The remainder of the reserve, 10, 000 strong, were sent to the aid of Shah Wali, still labouring unequally against the Bhau in the centre of the field. These mailed warriors were to charge with the Vizier in close order and at full gallop. Whenever they charged the enemy in front, the chief of the staff and Najib were directed to fall upon either flank. [10] With their own men in the firing line, the Maratha artillery could not respond to the shathurnals and the cavalry charge. Some 7, 000 Maratha cavalry and infantry were killed before the hand-to-hand fighting began at around 14:00 hrs. By 16:00 hrs, the tired Maratha infantry began to succumb to the onslaught of attacks from fresh Afghan reserves, protected by armoured leather jackets. [10] Outflanked Sadashiv Rao Bhau who had not kept any reserves, seeing his forward lines dwindling, civilians behind and upon seeing Vishwasrao disappear in the midst of the fighting, felt he had no choice but to come down from his elephant and lead the battle. [1] Taking advantage of this, the Afghan soldiers who had been captured by the Marathas earlier during the siege of Kunjpura revolted. The prisoners unwrapped their green belts and wore them as turbans to impersonate the troops of the Durrani Empire and began attacking from within. This brought confusion and great consternation to the Maratha soldiers, who thought that the enemy had attacked from the rear. Some Maratha troops, seeing that their general had disappeared from his elephant, panicked and scattered in disarray. [10] Abdali had given a part of his army the task of surrounding and killing the Gardis, who were at the leftmost part of the Maratha army. Bhausaheb had ordered Vitthal Vinchurkar (with 1500 cavalry) and Damaji Gaikwad (with 2500 cavalry) to protect the Gardis. However, after seeing the Gardis having no clearing for directing their cannon fire at the enemy troops, they lost their patience and decided to fight the Rohillas themselves. Thus, they broke their position and went all out on the Rohillas. The Rohilla riflemen started accurately firing at the Maratha cavalry, which was equipped only with swords. This gave the Rohillas the opportunity to encircle the Gardis and outflank the Maratha centre while Shah Wali pressed on attacking the front. Thus the Gardis were left defenseless and started falling one by one. [10] Vishwasrao had already been killed by a shot to the head. Bhau and his royal Guard fought till the end, the Maratha leader having three horses shot out from under him. At this stage, Holkar, realising the battle was lost, broke from the Maratha left flank and retreated. [1] The Maratha front lines remained largely intact, with some of their artillery units fighting until sunset. Choosing not to launch a night attack, many Maratha troops escaped that night. Bhau's wife Parvatibai, who was assisting in the administration of the Maratha camp, escaped to Pune with her bodyguard, Janu Bhintada. Some 15, 000 soldiers managed to reach Gwalior. [1] Reasons for the outcome Durrani had both numeric as well as qualitative superiority over Marathas. The combined Afghan army was much larger than that of Marathas. Though the infantry of Marathas was organized along European lines and their army had some of the best French-made guns of the time, their artillery was static and lacked mobility against the fast-moving Afghan forces. The heavy mounted artillery of Afghans proved much better in the battlefield than the light artillery of Marathas. [26. page needed] None of the other Hindu Kings joined forces to fight Abdali. Allies of Abdali, namely, Najib, Shuja and the Rohillas knew North India very well. He was also diplomatic, striking agreements with Hindu leaders, especially the Jats and Rajputs, and former rivals like the Nawab of Awadh, appealing to him in the name of religion. [10] Moreover, the senior Maratha chiefs constantly bickered with one another. Each had ambitions of carving out their independent states and had no interest in fighting against a common enemy. [27] Some of them did not support the idea of a pitched battle and wanted to fight using guerrilla tactics instead of charging the enemy head-on. [28] The Marathas were fighting alone at a place which was 1000 miles away from their capital Pune. [29] Raghunathrao was supposed to go north to reinforce the army. Raghunathrao asked for large amount of wealth and troops, which was denied by Sadashivrao Bhau, his cousin and Diwan of Peshwa, so he declined to go. [12] Sadashivrao Bhau was there upon made commander in chief of the Maratha Army, under whom the Battle of Panipat was fought. Some historians have opined, that Peshwa's decision to appoint Sadashivrao Bhau as the Supreme Commander instead of Malharrao Holkar or Raghunathrao proved to be an unfortunate one, as Sadashivrao was totally ignorant of the political and military situation in North India. [30] If Holkar had remained in the battlefield, the Maratha defeat would have been delayed but not averted. Ahmad Shah's superiority in pitched battle could have been negated if the Marathas had conducted their traditional ganimi kava, or guerrilla warfare, as advised by Malharrao Holkar, in Punjab and in north India. Abdali was in no position to maintain his field army in India indefinitely. [28] Massacres after the battle The Afghan cavalry and pikemen ran wild through the streets of Panipat, killing tens of thousands of Maratha soldiers and civilians. [7] 8] The women and children seeking refuge in streets of Panipat were hounded back in Afghan camps as slaves. Children over 14 were beheaded before their own mothers and sisters. Afghan officers who had lost their kin in battle were permitted to carry out massacres of 'infidel' Hindus the next day also, in Panipat and the surrounding area. [31] They arranged victory mounds of severed heads outside their camps. According to the single best eyewitness chronicle – the bakhar by Shuja-ud-Daula 's Diwan Kashi Raj – about 40, 000 Maratha prisoners were slaughtered in cold blood the day after the battle. [7] 8] According to Hamilton, a reporter of the Bombay Gazette about half a million Marathi people were present there in Panipat town and he gives a figure of 40, 000 prisoners as executed by Afghans. [7] 8] Many of the fleeing Maratha women jumped into the Panipat wells rather than risk rape and dishonour. [31] All of the prisoners were transported on bullock carts, camels and elephants in bamboo cages. [31] Siyar-ut-Mutakhirin says: 31] The unhappy prisoners were paraded in long lines, given a little parched grain and a drink of water, and beheaded. and the women and children who survived were driven off as slaves – twenty-two thousand, many of them of the highest rank in the land. Aftermath Mahadaji Shinde restored the Maratha domination on northern India, within a decade after the war. The bodies of Vishwasrao and Bhau were recovered by the Marathas and were cremated according to their custom. [32] Bhau's wife Parvatibai was saved by Holkar, per the directions of Bhau, and eventually returned to Pune. Peshwa Balaji Baji Rao, uninformed about the state of his army, was crossing the Narmada with reinforcements when he heard of the defeat. He returned to Pune and never recovered from the shock of the debacle at Panipat. [1] According to Shuresh Sharma, It was Balaji Bajirao's love of pleasure which was responsible for Panipat. He delayed at Paithan celebrating his second marriage until December 27, when it was too late. 33] Jankoji Scindia was taken prisoner and executed at the instigation of Najib. Ibrahim Khan Gardi was tortured and executed by enraged Afghan soldiers. [32] The Marathas never fully recovered from the loss at Panipat, but they remained the predominant military power & the largest empire in the Indian subcontinent and managed to retake Delhi 10 years later. However, their claim over all of India ended with the three Anglo-Maratha Wars, almost 50 years after Panipat, in the early 1800s. [34] The Jats under Suraj Mal benefited significantly from not participating in the Battle of Panipat. They provided considerable assistance to the Maratha soldiers and civilians who escaped the fighting. [35] Ahmad Shah's victory left him, in the short term, the undisputed master of North India. However, his alliance quickly unravelled amidst squabbles between his generals and other princes, the increasing restlessness of his soldiers over pay, the increasing Indian heat and arrival of the news that Marathas had organised another 100, 000 men in the south to avenge their loss and rescue captured prisoners. citation needed] Though Abdali won the battle, he also had heavy casualties on his side and sought peace with the Marathas. Abdali sent a letter to Nanasaheb Peshwa (who was moving towards Delhi, albeit at a very slow pace to join Bhau against Abdali) appealing to the Peshwa that he was not the one who attacked Bhau and was just defending himself. Abdali wrote in his letter to Peshwa on 10 February 1761: 36] There is no reason to have animosity amongst us. Your son Vishwasrao and your brother Sadashivrao died in battle, was unfortunate. Bhau started the battle, so I had to fight back unwillingly. Yet I feel sorry for his death. Please continue your guardianship of Delhi as before, to that I have no opposition. Only let Punjab until Sutlaj remain with us. Reinstate Shah Alam on Delhi's throne as you did before and let there be peace and friendship between us, this is my ardent desire. Grant me that desire. These circumstances made Abdali leave India at the earliest. Before departing, he ordered the Indian chiefs, through a Royal Firman (order) including Clive of India) to recognise Shah Alam II as Emperor. [37] Map of India in 1765, before the fall of Nawabs and Princely states nominally allied to the emperor (mainly in Green. Ahmad Shah also appointed Najib-ud-Daula as ostensible regent to the Mughal Emperor. In addition, Najib and Munir-ud-daulah agreed to pay to Abdali, on behalf of the Mughal king, an annual tribute of four million rupees. [37] This was to be Ahmad Shah's final major expedition to North India, as the losses in the battle left him without the capacity to wage any further war against the Marathas, and as he became increasingly preoccupied with the rise of the Sikhs. [38. page needed] Abdali never recovered from the pyrrhic victory and his losses left him weakened and unable to control his dominions leading to the rise of the Sikh Empire. Shah Shuja's forces (including Persian advisers) played a decisive role in collecting intelligence against the Hindu forces and was notorious in ambushing the leading in hundreds of casualties. [39] After the Battle of Panipat the services of the Rohillas were rewarded by grants of Shikohabad to Nawab Faiz-ullah Khan and of Jalesar and Firozabad to Nawab Sadullah Khan. Najib Khan proved to be an effective ruler. However, after his death in 1770, the Rohillas were defeated by the British East India Company. citation needed] Najib died on 30 October 1770. [40] Legacy The valour displayed by the Marathas was praised by Ahmad Shah Abdali. [41] The Marathas fought with the greatest valour which was beyond the capacity of other races. These dauntless blood-shedders didn't fall short in fighting and doing glorious deeds. But ultimately we won with our superior tactics and with the grace of the Divine Lord. The Third Battle of Panipat saw an enormous number of deaths and injuries in a single day of battle. It was the last major battle between South Asian-headed military powers until the creation of Pakistan and India in 1947. To save their kingdom, the Mughals once again changed sides and welcomed the Afghans to Delhi. The Mughals remained in nominal control over small areas of India but were never a force again. The empire officially ended in 1857 when its last emperor, Bahadur Shah II, was accused of being involved in the Sepoy Mutiny and exiled. The Marathas' expansion was delayed due to the battle, and the damage done to the Maratha morale from the initial defeat caused infighting to break out within the empire. They recovered their position under the next Peshwa Madhavrao I and were back in control of the north, finally occupying Delhi by 1771. However, after the death of Madhavrao, due to incessant infighting and external aggression from British imperialist forces, their claims to empire only officially ended in 1818 after three wars with the British East India Company. Meanwhile, the Sikhs—whose rebellion was the original reason Ahmad invaded—were left largely untouched by the battle. They soon retook Lahore. When Ahmad Shah returned in March 1764 he was forced to break off his siege after only two weeks due to a rebellion in Afghanistan. He returned again in 1767 but was unable to win any decisive battle. With his own troops complaining about not being paid, he eventually lost the region to the Sikh Khalsa Raj, who remained in control until 1849 when it was annexed by British East India Company. The battle was referred to in Rudyard Kipling 's poem "With Scindia to Delhi. Our hands and scarfs were saffron-dyed for signal of despair, When we went forth to Paniput to battle with the ~Mlech~ Ere we came back from Paniput and left a kingdom there. It is, however, also remembered as a scene of valour on both sides. Ataikhan, the adopted son of the wazir, was said to have been killed during this time when Yashwantrao Pawar climbed atop his elephant and struck him down. [42] 43] Santaji Wagh's corpse was found with over 40 mortal wounds. The bravery of Vishwas Rao, the Peshwa's son, and Sadashiv Bhau was acknowledged even by the Afghans. [44] In popular culture Bangali Poet Kaykobad wrote a long poem Mahashmashan based on this battle. Bengali writer, playwright Munier Choudhury s play Roktakto Prantor(1959) is based on the third battle of Panipat. The film Panipat, directed by director Ashutosh Gowariker, starring Arjun Kapoor, Sanjay Dutt and Kriti Sanon is based on the Third Battle of Panipat. The film released on December 6, 2019. [45] See also First Battle of Panipat Second Battle of Panipat Battle of Sialkot (1761) Battle of Gujranwala (1761) References ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Kaushik Roy, India's Historic Battles: From Alexander the Great to Kargil, Orient Longman, 2004) 90. ^ a b c d e f Sharma, Suresh K. (2006. Haryana: Past and Present. ISBN 9788183240468. ^ Kulke, Hermann; Rothermund, Dietmar (2004. A History of India. ISBN 9780415329194. ^ History. ISBN 9788187139690. ^ a b c d e f g h i Roy, Kaushik (2004. India's Historic Battles: From Alexander the Great to Kargil. pp. 84–85-93. ^ Third Battle of Panipat (1761. Panipat, Haryana. ^ a b c d e James Grant Duff "History of the Mahrattas, Vol II (Ch. 5) Printed for Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green, 1826" a b c d e T. S. Shejwalkar, Panipat 1761" in Marathi and English) Deccan College Monograph Series. I., Pune (1946) Black, Jeremy (2002. Warfare In The Eighteenth Century. Cassell. ISBN 978-0304362127. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Shejwalkar, Trimbak. Panipat 1761. ISBN 9788174346421. ^ a b Raghunathrao ^ Keene, H. G. The Fall of the Moghul Empire of Hindustan. VI. pp. 80–81. ^ Agrawal, Ashvini (1983. Events leading to the Battle of Panipat. Studies in Mughal History. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 26. ISBN 978-8120823266. ^ Robinson, Howard; James Thomson Shotwell (1922. Mogul Empire. The Development of the British Empire. Houghton Mifflin. p. 91. CS1 maint: uses authors parameter ( link) Agrawal, Ashvini (1983. p. 26. ISBN 8120823265. ^ Also see Syed Altaf Ali Brelvi, Life of Hafiz Rahmat Khan. pp. 108–09. ^ Lateef, S M. "History of the Punjab. p. 235. ^ Shejwalkar, Trimbak. ISBN 9788174346421. ^ Rawlinson, H. G (1926. An Account Of The Last Battle of Panipat. Oxford University Press. ^ Rawlinson, H. (1926. Oxford University Press. ^ Keene, H. (1887. Part I, Chapter VI: The Fall of the Moghul Empire of Hindustan. ^ War Elephants Written by Konstantin Nossov, Illustrated by Peter Dennis Format: Trade Paperback ISBN 978-1-84603-268-4 ^ Chandra, Satish (2004. Later Mughals. Medieval India: From Sultanate to the Mughals Part II. Har-Anand. ISBN 978-81-241-1066-9. ^ James Rapson, Edward; Wolseley Haig; Richard Burn; Henry Dodwell; Robert Eric Mortimer Wheeler (1937. The Cambridge History of India: The Mughul period, planned by W. Haig. 4. Cambridge University Press. p. 448. ^ a b Roy, Kaushik (2004. Orient Blackswan. ISBN 978-8-17824-109-8. ^ 250 years on, Battle of Panipat revisited. 13 January 2011. Retrieved 26 March 2012. ^ Claude Markovits, A history of modern India, 1480–1950. 207. ^ a b c d Rawlinson, H. (1937. Cambridge History of India. IV. p. 424 + note. ^ a b Barua, Pradeep (1994. Military Developments in India, 1750–1850. Journal of Military History. 58 (4) 599–616. doi: 10. 2307/2944270. JSTOR 2944270. ^ Sharma, Suresh K. Mittal Publications. p. 173. ISBN 9788183240468. Retrieved 7 March 2019. ^ Sarkar, Jadunath (1950. Fall of the Mughal Empire. Longmans. p. 235. ^ K. R. Qanungo, History of the Jats, Ed Dr Vir Singh, Delhi, 2003, p. 83 ^ G S Sardesai's Marathi Riyasat, volume 2. "The reference for this letter as given by Sardesai in Riyasat – Peshwe Daftar letters 2. 103, 146; 21. 206; 1. 202, 207, 210, 213; 29, 42, 54, and 39. 161. Satara Daftar – document number 2. 301, Shejwalkar's Panipat, page no. 99. Moropanta's account – 1. 1, 6, 7. ^ a b Mohsini, Haroon. "Invasions of Ahmad Shah Abdali. Archived from the original on 13 August 2007. Retrieved 13 August 2007. ^ MacLeod, John (2002. The History of India. Greenwood Press. ^ Rule of Shah Alam, 1759–1806 The Imperial Gazetteer of India, 1909, v. 2, p. 411. ^ Rule of Shah Alam, 1759–1806 The Imperial Gazetteer of India, 1909, v. 2, p. 411. ^ The lost Marathas of third battle of Panipat. India Today. 12 January 2012. Retrieved 5 April 2017. ^ India_Modern_Peshwas04. ^ Pilgrimage to Panipat. This was a revenge on behalf of the sikhs too as this same was Ataikhan was the killer of Baba Deep Singhji & desecrator of Harmandir Sahib in 1757. ^ Rao, S. "Walking the streets of Panipat. Indian Oil News. Archived from the original on 28 April 2008. Retrieved 8 April 2008. ^ 1] Further reading H. Rawlinson, An Account Of The Last Battle of Panipat and of the Events Leading To It, Hesperides Press (2006) ISBN 978-1-4067-2625-1 Vishwas Patil, Panipat – a novel based on the 3rd battle of Panipat, Venus (1990) Uday S. Kulkarni, A Non Fiction book – 'Solstice at Panipat – 14 January 1761' Mula-Mutha Publishers, Pune (2011. ISBN 978-81-921080-0-1 An Authentic Account of the Campaign of Panipat. Third Battle of Panipat by Abhas Verma ISBN 9788180903397 Bharatiya Kala Prakashana External links Panipat War memorial Pictures District Panipat Was late mediaeval India ready for a Revolution in Military Affairs? Part II Airavat Singh Detailed genealogy of the Durrani dynasty Historical maps of India in the 18th century.

Jis ny bi ye dubbing keya acha nahi keya haram. Reall mein Winer hote hai musolman aur credit lete hai hindu. Went to movie, thinking Arjun would be biggest disappointment. But disappointment was the direction and lack of story telling. Focus was on showing big canvases rather than building character. Stay for the fight at end, might enjoy it. Kriti was good. Sanjay Dutt disappointments. सही हुआ जो फ्लाॅप हो गयी, कम से कम एक संदेश तो गया कि अगर सूरजमल जैसे महान योद्धाओ को गलत दिखाओगे, अर्जुन कपूर जबरदस्ती थोपोगे, इतिहास के नाम पर कुछ भी गू परोसोगे तो जनता धूल चटा देगी, मेरे दिल की तमन्ना पूरी हुयी, फ्लाॅप हुयी जोधा अकबर जैसी मूवी बनाने वाले जिहादी की मूवी ।.

3:27:30. mention of my ancestor, who captured Delhi. Proud of being part of Maratha warriors. Har har Mahadev. Jai Bhavani Jai Shivaji. Panipat: the great betrayal video. Panipat 3a the great betrayal worksheet. Panipat the great betrayal meaning. پختونوں کے چہروں پر مسکراہٹ بکھرنے والا عظیم انسان تجھے قوم کی جانب سے سلام.

Panipat the great betrayal trailer. Panipat: the great betrayal. Uffff arjun k elava koe or hero ni mila sb s bekar actor h arjun motta actor. Panipat the great betrayal history. Panipat 3a the great betrayal tiktok. Panipat: the great betrayal movie. Film is not reality. Ahmed Shah abdali was a great Muslim and pushtoon leader.

Panipat: the great betrayal lyrics. Create an account Welcome! Register for an account your email your username A password will be e-mailed to you. Password recovery Recover your password Home Tags Panipat: The Great Betrayal 's compelling news content and trusted multi-platform network attracts a loyal readership. This offers advertisers an exceptional opportunity to connect with audiences who are otherwise difficult to reach. Copyright 2020 Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd & Garavi Gujarat Publications We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By browsing this website, you agree to our use of cookies. Ok More Info.

Panipat the great betrayal full movie. When the video started, I was Like, What the heck. Where's the ceiling fan man? And then a few seconds later, Oh there it is. Everything is good with the world again. Panipat: the great betrayal story. Panipat: the great betrayal quotes. Best thing to do is pirate this movie and not allow the racist Bollywood industry to make a single Rupee of this flim. Panipat the great betrayal story. Hindutva trying to rewrite history to make them feel good.

Panipat the great betrayal full movie download. Panipat the great betrayal box office. Akhri jang hogi tumsy abhi gavwahind hogi. Starring – Arjun Kapoor, Sanjay Dutt, Kriti Sanon, Mohnish Bahl, Padmini Kolhapure Directed By Ashutosh Gowariker India is going through a phase where a lot of people are gaining access to the real history of our country. So much so that what was supposed to be taught and researched upon in schools and colleges many years ago is being revealed to us through films. On a personal front, I know that the history that I was taught in school was not even 2% of what our country actually is. India is not only rich with culture and heritage, we were… and are blessed with the bravest of heroes that ever walked on this blessed soil of ours. Plot The film talks about the 3 rd battle of Panipat which happened on 14 t h January, 1761. The Marathas were at the pinnacle of their rule with most parts of India under their control. However, this increasing foothold of theirs in not taken lightly by a lot. Delhi and its surrounding parts are still under the control of the Mughals but with the Mughal dynasty in decline, the Marathas are eyeing that region. This news reaches the Afghan King, Ahmad Shah Abdali (Sanjay Dutt) who plans to invade India in order to not only retrieve his lost territories but also take control of entire country. He attacks and captures the Punjab region and this news reaches Nana Saheb Peshwa. Nana Saheb Peshwa orders a counsel among his generals. They plan to stop the afghans before they can invade more parts of the country but are skeptical as to how the plans can be carried out considering their battles in the past have led to depleted resources and reserves. Sadashiv Rao Bhau, however, takes the responsibility of taking around 40000 soldiers with limited resources with him in an attempt to increase this number by joining hands with all other surrounding kingdoms. Perhaps, one of the few brave attempts anyone has taken during that time for a unified hindostan. How Sadashiv Bhau is able to unite all the kingdoms and use their power and resources to defeat the Afghan King Abdali forms the rest of the movie. Good Points When it comes to period films, we all expect to see the world as it was during those times and mind you, Ashutosh Gowariker is definitely one of the few directors who goes to great lengths in this regard. You not only get the feel of grandeur but also the mentality of the Marathas, the afghans and other kingdom during that time. I should say, this should have been released in 3d. All the actors have done a great job, it is easy (if not so difficult) to portray a fictional character but when portraying someone who existed, that is when things get complicated. For people, especially historians, are looking at you and one small mistake, you are facing the gallows. Ashutosh Gowariker is also one of the few directors who knows how to utilize ground breaking visual effects techniques, however, I have been critical about the action sequences in his past movies especially Jodha Akbar and Mohenjo Daro. It is almost like, he hates violence and therefore, tries to keep it clean. However, this movie is a surprise. The director has literally up the scaled in terms of visual effects and action sequences. We are not dealing with modern warfare in these movies, the warriors are not using assault rifles or shotguns or pistols that can lead to a clean kill with a headshot. We are dealing with warriors carrying swords, daggers, and knives. Cannon warfare is still in practice. Muskets were seeing the first light of the day but were still ineffective for you can see the enemy laughing at you for bringing a ‘bringing a gun that takes 3-5 minutes to reload to a ‘sword battle. Whats more, this is the 3 rd battle of Panipat, one of the bloodiest battles in Indian History that resulted in heavy casualties on both sides. Wikipedia tells you who won the battle but after watching the movie, you might think otherwise. Bad Points Only one if you ask me. The length of the movie, it is over 3 hours long. Cant blame anyone for this for this was a battle of wits from both sides. A game of cat and mouse, 2 brave warriors commanding an army of close to 100000, you surely want to know that as a leader what were they thinking before coming to Panipat… or were they even thinking at all. Verdict Score – 9/10 This is a must watch. Dont look at it as a boring history lesson but look at it as a story of courage, valor and honor. We all need the motivation and the belief that heroes do exist. This is the story of a man who fought for a dream of a unified India. It is time, we carry forward the legacy. Published by spundandasgupta Love to read and write. I am also a gaming freak. View all posts by spundandasgupta Published 11th Dec 2019.

Panipat: the great betrayal movies

Lets just call it Ashutosh Gowarikers version of history, but even then Panipat: The Great Betrayal is a hard pill to swallow. The action starts from Shaniwarwada in Pune, the capital of the Maratha empire and moves on to Panipat - where the epic battle was fought. At 173 minutes, with an army of writers responsible for the dreary screenplay, Gowarikers Panipat seemed to have lasted as long as the war. To check the growing Maratha influence, the Afghan ruler Ahmad Shah Abdali (Sanjay Dutt) is called in by the Mughals. This leads Nana Saheb Peshwa (Monish Behl) to send his trusted Sadashivrao Bhau (Arjun Kapoor) along with his own son and cavalry to forge ahead to the north that eventually leads to the Third Battle of Panipat. But everything here is burdened with Gowarikers overt preoccupation to glorify Maratha rulers and to eulogise their valour and love for Hindustan, never mind that the concept of a “nation state” as a whole came into being much later. Click on the player below to listen to the podcast. But for the purpose of convenience its us vs them - we on the side of the Maratha warriors and they the brutes. The biases amount to almost caricaturish portrayals of many of the royals who oppose the Marathas. Except for the introductory scene of Abdali with a dagger fight and an attempted assassination attempt that the emperor squashes with barbaric rage, Sanjay Dutt is mostly out of breath and trying to make sense of all that is happening around him moving laboriously in those velvet shrugs and elaborate headgear. His questions though are most handy especially for us viewers, who are struggling to fathom who is fighting whom and for what? Actor Mantra who is impressive as the dubious Najib-ud-Daulah supplies us with details. Arjun Kapoor is a straight backed and wooden faced as Sadashivrao Bhau at war and during peace equally wooden and awkward around Kriti Sanon, his love interest who goes on to become his wife and the narrator of the tale. The absence of Sanjay Leela Bhansalis grand vision looms large in almost every frame and even if one ignores the terrible music, blaring background score and poor CGI, the fact that we never really connect with Sadashivrao and Parvati or his mission for a Maratha samrajya takes away from the over all impact of Panipat. Panipat: The Great Betrayal as its called - feels like one too without the requisite emotional playoff or enough visually arresting scenes. In the end, its all reduced to a boring history lecture that lasts almost 3 hours. My Rating: 1. 5 Quints out of 5. (Make sure you don't miss fresh news updates from us. Click here to stay updated) Follow our Movie Reviews section for more stories.

Panipat 3a the great betrayal emiway. Arjun Kapoor & Lara Dutta ❤. Great movie, great performance by all the Actors, sanjay dutt played a great role of Abdalli, Arjun Kapoor best performace so far. Panipat: The Great betrayal. Cast Arjun Kapoor, Sanjay Dutt, Kriti Sanon, Mohnish Bahl, Padmini Kolhapure, Suhasini Mulay, Zeenat Aman, Ravindra Mahajani, Kunal Kapoor, Nawab Shah, Mantra, Fahim Fazli, Mir Sarwar, Abhishek Nigam, Mohit. D. Anand.

Panipat 3a the great betrayal lyrics

Mai JAT Hu lekin MARATHA asli HINDU warriors the Salute 🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️. Der kha da ahmad shah nwaseyaaa 🤣🤣. Panipat the great betrayal full movie in hindi. Arjun Kapoor, Sanjay Dutt and Kriti Sanon in posters of Panipat, Facebook Text Size: T he last time he was here, the Yamuna ran red for seven days. This time he has come with one lakh soldiers. ” Thats a line from Ashutosh Gowarikers upcoming Hindi movie Panipat, the lodestar battle that Home Minister Amit Shah loves to slide into his conversations. But as battles go, the Third Battle of Panipat in 1761 is an odd choice for a newly patriotic, flag-waving, cheerleading Indian film industry. After all, the most significant and popular memory of the battle between the forces of the Afghan warlord Ahmad Shah Abdali and the Marathas is that it was a military debacle. It drove the Marathas out of the north for a decade. (Not that you would get the sentiment if you saw the trailer of the Sanjay Dutt, Arjun Kapoor and Kriti Sanon-starrer film. ) So, why would a new India, supposedly still suffering from and still avenging the psychic wounds of hundreds of years of foreign rule, want to revisit the Panipat battle through Ashutosh Gowarikers ninth film, releasing on December 6? Do Indians in 2019 really want to see the brave Marathas, led by the Peshwas cousin Sadashiv Rao Bhau, being brutally destroyed by Abdali, who invaded India nine times between 1747 and 1769? Its not a simple memory of victory and loss. This was a decisive battle that changed history, humiliated the Hindu Marathas even as they were on a winning spree, and signalled a shift in power, the fallout of which reverberated for centuries. The battle, as Amit Shah said, “paved the way for foreigners to enter India”. At a BJP meeting in January this year, he said the Lok Sabha elections this year were like the battle of Panipat, and they just could not afford to lose it. The key lies in the geopolitics of the time. Also read: Panipat film raises alarm in Afghanistan over Abdali portrayal, embassy writes to MEA ‘The great betrayal The Marathas were virtually ruling Delhi by the middle of the 18 th century. The much-weakened 16th Mughal emperor, famously blind Shah Alam II, had been installed by Sadashiv Rao Bhau after deposing Shah Jahan III. The British East India Company was hovering around Delhi, and in 1764 would defeat Shah Alam II in the Battle of Buxar, a blow from which the crumbling Mughal empire would never recover. But as the Panipat trailer hints, and the tagline emphasises (“The Great Betrayal”) instead of battling the growing power of the British, the Mughals considered the Marathas their real enemy. The movie appears to be based on Marathi historian T. S. Shejwalkars work, Panipat 1761, where he argued that the Marathas sacrificed themselves to save the Mughals, who were busy surrendering to the British. The trailer shows an emperor, clearly Shah Alam II, convinced that no one would dare go against the Marathas. Until a Mughal courtier says: “ Ek hai, Jahapanah ”. It also shows another Muslim ruler handing over his guns to Abdali. “ Ham Maratha ka safaya kar denge. (We will remove all evidence of Marathas from here) ” to which the Muslim ally, either from the Rohillas or Awadh, says: “ Phir hamari bandookein aapki (Then our guns are yours)”. Also read: A rarely told story of a Maratha vote-bank in deep, distant Haryana The Muslim ‘invader Abdali fits the Alauddin Khilji mould of “otherness” – tall, imposing, and dismissive of Hindu martial prowess. The two manifest the stock Muslim “invader” tropes that dominate the 21st-century Hindu psyche. As one of the Panipat posters on Abdali says: “Death strikes where his shadow falls. ” “Why are you throwing your life away for such a small piece of land, ” Abdali asks Sadashiv in the trailer, and he answers even more dramatically (or at least as dramatically as Arjun Kapoors acting will allow him) “I am ready to die for even a single grain of dust of my motherland. ” Despite Sadashivs best intentions, as historian Audrey Trushcke puts it: “The battle was a bloodbath. A standard number given is that 40, 000 or 50, 000 Marathas were slaughtered. As a Bollywood film in 2019, I would expect to see a strong Muslim vs Hindu storyline and glorification of the Marathas. ” Which would mean the demonisation of Abdali. No wonder the Afghan embassy has already written to the Narendra Modi government fearing misrepresentation of Abdali in the film. Abdali was the first king of Afghanistan, founder of the Durrani dynasty, but not their greatest ambassador to India. As popular historian Archana Goradia Gupta points out to ThePrint, even now in Punjab, which Abdali looted so thoroughly, a saying goes: “ Khanda peenda lahe da, baki Ahmad Shahe da (only what weve eaten and drunk is ours, the rest belongs to Ahmad Shah Abdali. ” Also read: The horrifying timeline of India going crazy over Padmavati Fact and fiction For Reliance Entertainment, the distributors of the film, “all the three main cast are looking exciting in their roles”. “The story is patriotic. So, I expect it to do well. In India, traditionally costume dramas do well and in this case, the story is established, ” Reliance Entertainment CEO Shibasish Sarkar told ThePrint. Indeed, unlike Sanjay Leela Bhansalis Padmaavat (2018) and Gowarikers own Jodhaa Akbar (2008) – which were part-myth, part-real – there is no ambiguity about anyones existence here. Gowariker has been earlier criticised by many Hindutva advocates for greenwashing Mughal history and introducing distortions in the portrayal of Akbar. It was finally the Supreme Court that intervened as the fact-checker for Jodhaa Akbar. Panipat has been produced by Ashutosh Gowariker Private Limited and a new company started by London-based pharma professional Rohit Shelatkar, Vision World. Shelatkar has been quoted as saying: “The hardships Marathas faced reaching Panipat and fighting the battle with the mighty Afghans 1, 000 miles away from their homes in Pune just to protect our motherland from the invaders is something our youth can learn from. Theres a lot to take from Panipat — bravery, might, loyalty, discipline, and patriotism. ” And chest-thumping patriotism is an evergreen winner – in cinema, in deodorant ads or TV channel debates. Especially when it is invoked against the foreigner in history. The subtext in these polarised times is simple: when it came to the crunch, it was the Hindu Marathas who defended India, not the Muslim Mughals. Is it a coincidence that the movie is being released on 6 December, the day when the mosque built by Babur — who established the Mughal empire after the First Battle of Panipat in 1526 — was demolished in Ayodhya 27 years ago? The author is a senior journalist. Views are personal. ThePrint is now on Telegram. For the best reports & opinion on politics, governance and more, subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram.

Panipat the great betrayal songs. ⛳🚩जय जिजाऊ_जय शिवराय_जय शंभू राजे🚩. Panipat 3a the great betrayal pdf. Panipat: the great betrayal full. Oooh ma God its really so hurting from the beginning it left me crying but all turned well. Tanaji dekho bhai ek movie to bkvaas thi.

Isse acha to sohail khan ko bhi le lete 😂. Panipat: the great betrayal youtube. Panipat: the great betrayal walkthrough. Atjun lol😂🤣😂😂🤣. Jay Maratha, Jay Bhavani Jai Hind, Jai Bharat Bharat Mata Ki Jay🇮🇳🇮🇳❤❤. Very good movie with facts and gowarikar simple touch to film is commendable.

Panipat: the great betrayal online

Panipat the great betrayal scene. Panipat: the great betrayal season.

Panipat the great betrayal trailer reaction

Panipat: the great betrayal meaning. 1:30 was not required I think... why to make such analogy. Panipat: the great betrayal stories.

Panipat: the great betrayal game

Panipat: the great betrayal series. I totally agree with Sanjay dutt. Abdali was a great king. Panipat 3a the great betrayal new.